The Church had claimed it could not be held vicariously responsible because there was no formal employment relationship with its priests.īut Mr Justice Macduff decided the professional relationship between a priest and his bishop was sufficiently close so as to impose responsibility.įirst, I just want to show the error in your reasoning. "This is a ruling in favour of children and rightly places the responsibility on the Church to ensure that they select and monitor priests carefully and have robust procedures in place to take steps to protect children when there are concerns." Religious organisations are no different. Professional relationship Jon Brown, from the children's charity, said: "All organisations that work with children have a clear responsibility to ensure their safety. The NSPCC has welcomed the ruling and said it will look closely at the wider implications. Lawyers for the claimant said it was the first time a court had been asked to rule on whether the "relationship between a Catholic priest and his bishop is akin to an employment relationship".
The judge said the Portsmouth Diocese "may be vicariously liable" for Father Baldwin's alleged wrongdoings. The woman, now aged 47, alleges she was abused by the late Father Wilfred Baldwin at a Hampshire children's home. Mr Justice MacDuff gave a decision in favour of a woman, who claims she was sexually assaulted as a child by a priest of the Portsmouth Diocese.
0 kommentar(er)
